Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dragonfly Investing's avatar

I always enjoy your research and loved this post in particular. I hold a (6%) position in stne for similiar reasons.

One thing I often find strange is the usage of wacc and country risk in evaluating businesses.

a) the important factor for value creation is the cost of capital (in relation to the return on capital amd reinvestment rate). It doesn't matter for e.x. that the default rate in a country is high (too much leverage used by other companies) if you invest in a profitable company with ample net cash. It doesn't make the cost of capital greater or the returns of investing in the company smaller

b) In general I find the usage of wacc peculiar. It makes sense to compare the return on capital of projects/businesses to the average cost of capital to understand if the project makes sense. However when buying another company we should compare their return on capital to our cost of capital as we are the ones investing the capital

In my (humble) opinion it makes more sense to use the same discount rate for all companies (our wacc - but it can be any number really as long as we are consistent, I use 10) and just demand more margin of safety for riskier securities.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts